LETTER TO EDITOR
A recent letter to the editor suggests that the goal of the constitutional amendment is to give Kansans a greater voice concerning who serves on the state’s highest court. If that is true, why is the proposed amendment on the primary ballot on August 4? Why not put the question to a vote at the general election in November when more Kansans turn out to vote? The answer to these questions is because the proposed constitutional amendment is intended to politicize the judiciary.
